PMD Results
The following document contains the results of PMD 5.3.5.
Files
fr/paris/lutece/plugins/workflow/modules/formlimit/business/TaskFormLimitConfigDAO.java
| Violation |
Line |
| Use block level rather than method level synchronization |
64–75 |
fr/paris/lutece/plugins/workflow/modules/formlimit/service/FormLimitPlugin.java
| Violation |
Line |
| All methods are static. Consider using a utility class instead. Alternatively, you could add a private constructor or make the class abstract to silence this warning. |
47–59 |
fr/paris/lutece/plugins/workflow/modules/formlimit/service/TaskFormLimit.java
| Violation |
Line |
| Use block level rather than method level synchronization |
93–151 |
| Avoid unused local variables such as 'allrecords'. |
128 |
| Deeply nested if..then statements are hard to read |
132–138 |
fr/paris/lutece/plugins/workflow/modules/formlimit/web/FormLimitTaskComponent.java
| Violation |
Line |
| If you run in Java5 or newer and have concurrent access, you should use the ConcurrentHashMap implementation |
80 |